Critics and Art
by Laila Chris
Creating is art
The art of creating shapes, shades, showcases
First language
Primal process
Critics interpretations
Second thought
Redundancy of over explanations
New information
Against exaggerations
Repetitive diagnosis
Higher amount of grotesque translations
Hate critics
When they don’t expand
When they don’t turn comprehensible
The things that are not that way
Creating a new process
The process of art making
Words on frames
Notes in chapters
Chords in conclusions
Reading response
Critics should evaluate
Criticism isn’t appraisal
No judgments of value
But measurements of merits
Critics are investigators
(A different sense of music,
painting,
or literature)
A critical study implies historical context
Social description, again not appraisal
(A different sense of music,
painting,
or literature)
Radically distant from judging wine, cigars, food, or Playboy magazines
A proposition
The embryo of philosophy of art
A theory, not a mere quarrel
Art as a human activity
Art as an essential practice:
Musical compositions,
Sculptures,
Poems,
Cathedrals,
Films,
Dramas,
Paintings…
Spontaneous expressions of emotional disturbances,
Craving beautiful things,
Fears, phobias, desiring mates,
A special form to contemplate nature
Critics’ role is indeed
Overcome those experiments,
Executions, (de)codifications, and meanings
Art consumers may address that
A third consumption
Aesthetics appreciation